Home > Financial Infographics > The History of US Government Corporate Bailouts

The History of US Government Corporate Bailouts

Share

Get the breakdown on who the United States has bailed out, for how much, and what happened, in this infographic:

bailouts

Too Big to Fail: A History of Government Bailouts

The money that presidents Bush and Obama have recently showered on the auto industry, insurance companies and financial institutions aren’t the first dollars that the federal government has used to bail out companies or entire industries that are labeled “too big to fail.”

In fact, since the 1970s, the federal government has rarely shied away from throwing around its financial weight to keep certain businesses afloat.

This is a controversial practice. Taxpayers and advocacy groups don’t like spending their money to prop up companies or industries that have suffered financial problems because of perceived wrongdoing or mismanagement. The government often argues that it is saving industries that are too important to the country to die. If they did, the government argues, the country’s economy would be in danger.

Who’s right? As with most big questions, there’s no one correct answer. But if you think that the recent government bailouts are something new, you don’t know your history.

For instance, the government helped bailout the struggling railroad industry in 1970. A nearly bankrupt Penn Central Railroad asked the government for assistance. The government, not wanting to see the railroad collapse, provided $676 million in loan guarantees and consolidated Penn Central with five other struggling railroad companies to form Consolidated Railroads.

In 1980, the government backed the Chrysler Corporation Loan Guarantee Act of 1979. This allowed Chrysler to borrow $1.5 billion in privately funded loans. This helped rescue the troubled automaker from bankruptcy.

One of the first banks labeled with the “too big to fail” moniker, Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Company stayed alive in 1984 thanks to a rescue from the FDIC. The FDIC injected $4.5 billion into the struggling bank and took over 80 percent of its shares.

Following the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Congress passed the Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act. This provided $15 billion to airlines to help cover the costs of the government’s order to ground all aircraft in the days following the terrorist attacks. It also helped airlines defend against any lawsuits resulting from the attacks.

Of course, 2008 was a banner year for government bailouts. The government provided funds to Bear Stearns in the form of a $29 billion non-recourse loan; promised up to $100 billion each to mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, in an effort to save the struggling mortgage industry; gave $150 billion to insurance company A.I.G. in three separate payments; provided Ford, General Motors and Chrysler with a $25 billion stimulus package; and issued a total of $351 billion, in the form of bailout money and loans, to Citigroup.

What will the results of the 2008 bailouts be? Again, that’s a question to which no one has a definitive answer. It’s important to remember, though, that the 2008 bailouts weren’t the first and certainly won’t be the last issued by the federal government.

Posted by: admin     Tags: , , ,

related infographics

  • http://www.printingchoice.com Shane

    Man, Chrysler is on there twice! I think the auto industry is doing a lot of things wrong, and you don’t deserve a bailout multiple times. That’s bogus.

  • Marcus

    Chrysler, GM, they need to be on there, for one day we will ask….”Whom shall we get to make our tanks, our APC’s, our Humvees? Mercedes? Honda? Toyota?”

  • BD

    The first time around, Chrysler’s bailout was pure mismanagement.

    This time it’s more the government’s fault than the auto company’s. The federal government mandated they make cars that nobody wants. Sorry, people don’t want little tin cans to ride around in, but the government added these regulations to get people out of their evil SUV’s. Naturally, nobody bought them.

    Then we all act shocked and outraged when the auto companies think they deserve a bail out. I mean, the only reason they were building these cars that nobody wanted was because the government said they had to.

    The root of the problems, by and large, is the government. You can make a very similar case for the housing bust.

    But how do we fix it? MORE government intervention, of course!

  • BJ

    Never underestimate the power of denial. The big 3 are in doodoo for 1 simple reason – they make crappy small/mid-sized cars. They are in bed with the oil industry (and gov’t – nice love triangle there). Imports are far far ahead in quality, reliability, durability and gas mileage. Until they step it up, People will keep buying imports. They don’t deserve to make cars.

  • Steve

    Back to BJ:

    Don’t forget that most “imports” (Honda, Toyota, Nissan) sold here are now made here. Since 2005, non-domestic automobile manufacturers have produced more vehicles in the U.S. than GM/Ford/Chrysler.

  • http://blog.ausgetauscht.de/fin/2009/08/11/in-case-you-missed-them-some-links-of-interest-81109/ Fin/Inv » Blog Archive » In Case You Missed Them – Some Links of Interest (8/11/09)

    [...] the flash by moving to options (Zero Hedge).A visual of the history of bailouts, 1970-2008 edition (Financial Infographics, HT Barry Ritholtz).Oil prices have risen lately, causing Goldman to warn that as the economy rebounds, crude oil [...]

  • guest

    The information regarding Conrail is inaccurate. The government spent an additional 19.7 billion to keep Conrail operating before it began to turn a profit. http://www.propublica.org/special/bailout-aftermaths#

Recent Infographics
Archives